PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN WINDOW DISPLAY TERHADAP GAMBARAN URETER DENGAN KASUS UROLITHIASIS PADA PEMERIKSAAN CT STONOGRAM DI RSUP DR.HASAN SADIKIN BANDUNG

THE EFFECTS OF WINDOW DISPLAY USAGE ON THE URETER IMAGES WITH UROLITHIASIS RESULTED BY CT STONOGRAM EXAMINATION IN CENTRAL GENERAL HOSPITAL OF DR. HASAN SADIKIN BANDUNG

Authors

  • Lili Julia Rahmat Politeknik Al Islam Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38215/jtkes.v5i1.94

Keywords:

MSCT stonogram, urolithiasis, window display, window level.

Abstract

MSCT stonogram plays an important role in establishing diagnosis in urolithiasis. The examination technique is carried out without the use of contrast agents as required in other modalities. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of window level on MSCT stonography on ureteral images. The research was conducted at RSUP.DR.Hasan Sadikin Bandung. This is an analytic observational research with a cross-sectional study design. Tools used in this research are MSCT Hitachi scenaria 128 slices, multi planar reformat (MPR) and curve planar reformat (CPR) image reconstruction using Terarecon with iNtuition client software ver 4.4.12.100. Data were taken from 14 random samples of patients with urolithiasis cases who had undergone MSCT stonography examination. The data were assessed by three Consultant Radiologists and then analysed by a statistical test of IBM SPSS statistics ver. 25.0 in 2019. Results showed that Ho was rejected and Ha was accepted. They explain that the change in the window level on the MSCT stonogram examination with urolithiasis cases affects the resulted ureteral images with p value of 0.041 (p < 0.05). Therefore, it can be concluded that the use of window width 350 and Window level 60 can visualize very clear pictures of the ureter after CPR reconstruction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bogart, J. A. (2018). BODY CT secrets (1nd ed.). New York USA: mosby.

BONTRAGER_ Radiographic Positioning and Related Anatomy, 6th ed, KL Bontrager.pdf. (n.d.).

Clark, S., Whitley, A. S., Jefferson, G., Holmes, K., Sloane, C., Anderson, C., & Hoadley, G. (n.d.). POSITIONING IN.

Eliason, N. E. (2006). A Textbook. In American Speech (Vol. 15). https://doi.org/10.2307/486972

Elliot K.Fishman, R. Brooke Jeffrey, J. (2004). Multidetector computed tomography - Principles, Techniques & Clinical Applications (1st ed.; J. Kim, Ed.). Retrieved from https://www.google.co.zw/#q=multidetector+computed+tomography

H. Ellis James, MD, F. (2017). ACR Manual on Contrast Media ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media. ACR.

Hamimi, A., & El Azab, M. (2016). MSCT renal stone protocol; Dose penalty and influence on management decision of patients: Is it really worth the radiation dose? Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 47(1), 319–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrnm.2015.11.001

Ilmiah Kesehatan Sandi Husada, J., Dwi Kaniya, T., Uyun, D., Departemen Radiologi, B., Sakit Urip Sumoharjo Bandar Lampung, R., & Departemen Radiologi Rumah Sakit Abdul Moeloek Bandar Lampung, B. (2020). Ct-Scan Non Kontras Pada Pasien Batu Saluran Kemih Non-Contrast CT Scan In Patients with Urinary Stones. Juni, 11(1), 284–291. https://doi.org/10.35816/jiskh.v10i2.272

JOHN T. HANSEN. (2014). NETTER’S ANATOMY COLORING BOOK (2nd Editio). New York USA.

Lilienthal, C. (2011). Urinary tract. Australian Doctor, (14-OCTOBER), 51–52. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/11368_13

Mosby, T. (2015). RADIOGRAOHIC POSITIONS & RADIOLOGC PROCEDURES (10nd ed.). New York USA: mosby.

O’Connor, O. J., & Maher, M. M. (2010). CT Urography. American Journal of Roentgenology, 195(5), 320–324. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.4198

Parihar, B. (2019). ROLE OF NON-CONTRAST COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN EVALUATION OF KIDNEY , URETER , AND URINARY BLADDER. (January), 38–41.

Paz, M. R., García, M. O., & P. Rodríguez Fernández. (2010). CT urography?: Saline infusion vs furosemide. European Journal of Radiology, 1–40.

SEERAM, E. (2014). Computed Tomography: Physical Principles, Clinical Applications, and Quality Control. In S. Elsevier (Ed.), Radiology (3nd ed., Vol. 194). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.194.3.782

Silverman, S. G., Leyendecker, J. R., & Amis, E. S. (2009). What is the current role of CT urography and MR urography in the evaluation of the urinary tract? Radiology, 250(2), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2502080534

Soomro, H. U., Hammad Ather, M., & Salam, B. (2016). Comparison of ureteric stone size, on bone window versus standard soft-tissue window settings, on multi-detector non-contrast computed tomography. Arab Journal of Urology, 14(3), 198–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2016.06.006

Downloads

Published

2022-07-04

How to Cite

Rahmat, L. J. (2022). PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN WINDOW DISPLAY TERHADAP GAMBARAN URETER DENGAN KASUS UROLITHIASIS PADA PEMERIKSAAN CT STONOGRAM DI RSUP DR.HASAN SADIKIN BANDUNG: THE EFFECTS OF WINDOW DISPLAY USAGE ON THE URETER IMAGES WITH UROLITHIASIS RESULTED BY CT STONOGRAM EXAMINATION IN CENTRAL GENERAL HOSPITAL OF DR. HASAN SADIKIN BANDUNG. Jurnal Teras Kesehatan, 5(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.38215/jtkes.v5i1.94

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Teras Kesehatan

Section

ARTIKEL

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Teras Kesehatan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish articles in Jurnal Teras Kesehatan agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright of the article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC-BY-SA or The Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)